shockrah/blog
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

new personal section for notes that i write more often than other stuff

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
shockrah 2020-07-07 21:28:38 -07:00
parent 67bd9888fd
commit 0f0bcb8fb8
1 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
notes/against-method.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Observations & Connections Based on Recent Things Around Me
A video from _Periodic Videos_ comes to mind wherein they tells a story about someone that tried to make a _mini-nuclear reactor_ in their kitchen.
The tone of the speaker in the video is in some ways mocking the guy for trying to do this in their own home and not in a lab.
Some believe that he [reactor-guy] was trying to split atoms and so he used some elements in a mix but it went wrong and blew up his stove-top.
> _What if he made a great discovery?_
When asked about this the speaker [speaker-guy] mentions that reactor-bro shouldn't be doing this in his home because its not safe and could kill him (reminder that battery engineers complain the same about home power cell diy'ers [see: muh safety argument]).
There's also random clips of nuclear testing demonstrations from the 50's which are seemingly randomly thrown in as if to insinuate that reactor-bro was trying to make or bomb or could have _nuked'd_ himeself.
It seems a bit out of place and weird.
PDF2LEFT: states about the epistemological doctrine of classical scientists in history: "who works in a particular historical situation must learn how to recognize error and how to live with it". Going on to say that they need a "_theory of error_ in addition to the _certain and infallible_ rules which define the approach to the truth.
Further: To develop a theory of error is to create an (likely unchanging) _theory of error_ is to riddle that same theory with historically sourced error.
In other words the theory itself is not free from the very thing that it describes as a problem to scientific development. [see observational bias, infinitesimal regression or observation]
# Something about a form of indoctrination I thought was cool
> Almost everyone now agrees that what looks like a result of reason - the mastery of a language, the existence of a richly articulated
perceptual world, logical ability - is due partly to indoctrination, partly a to a process of growth that proceeds with the force of natural low