updated main notes page to be more properly layed out

notes/against-method.md

@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
-# Observations & Connections Based on Recent Things Around Me
+# Against Method: study against logical positivism
+
+Word: I should note that this is written while reading through Feyeraband's essay. Henceforth expect knee-jerk-reaction type of writing as opposed to well thought out logical anything.
+
+Anything properly _fleshed out_ is labeled as such.
+
+
+## Observations & Connections Based on Recent Things Around Me
 
 A video from _Periodic Videos_ comes to mind wherein they tells a story about someone that tried to make a _mini-nuclear reactor_ in their kitchen.
 The tone of the speaker in the video is in some ways mocking the guy for trying to do this in their own home and not in a lab.
@@ -15,9 +22,28 @@ PDF2LEFT: states about the epistemological doctrine of classical scientists in h
 Further: To develop a theory of error is to create an (likely unchanging) _theory of error_ is to riddle that same theory with historically sourced error. 
 In other words the theory itself is not free from the very thing that it describes as a problem to scientific development. [see observational bias, infinitesimal regression or observation]
 
-# Something about a form of indoctrination I thought was cool
+## Something about a form of indoctrination I thought was cool
 
 > Almost everyone now agrees that what looks like a result of reason - the mastery of a language, the existence of a richly articulated
 perceptual world, logical ability - is due partly to indoctrination, partly a to a process of growth that proceeds with the force of natural low
 
 
+## Breaking the rules of classical epistemology
+
+> We find, then, that there is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other.
+
+Hmm
+
+> Such violations are no accidental
+
+hmmmmmm
+
+> they are not the results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided
+
+!
+
+> On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress
+
+Proress in this case really means "knowledge".
+I'm choosing to interpret this using Bloom's method of describing understanding. New discoveries don't always give us comprehensions as we've really only uncovered an apparant fact.
+Comprehension, understanding, and intuition come later after some time.

notes/ellipse-calculations.md

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# Building an ellipse from 2 points
+

pages/notes-ramblings.md

@@ -2,3 +2,20 @@
 
 This page is dedicated to my own notes about stuff that I read.
 It's _very_ stream of concious-y and often not super coherent so often there gaping logical holes but I like the way they _feel_ so I link them on this page.
+
+## Philosophy
+
+* Is Logical Positivism a Meme? - _[Against Method](/notes/against-method.html)_
+
+## Cookery
+
+* Nothing Yet
+
+## Math Things
+
+* Nothing Yet
+
+## Design things
+
+* Nothing Yet
+